Minnesota Employment Guide is a publication of Madgett Law, LLC. It is general information about Minnesota law, not legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Whether any of it applies to your job turns on facts this site cannot know. This is attorney advertising.

Defined by statute

Employment misconduct

The unemployment-insurance standard for a discharge that makes an applicant ineligible: intentional, negligent, or indifferent conduct that is a serious violation of the standards of behavior an employer has the right to reasonably expect.

Nothing on this page is advice about your job, and no article can be. If you want your own facts looked at, a Minnesota employment attorney can do that — and several of the deadlines described on this site are short enough that waiting is itself a decision.

Also called: misconduct; discharged for misconduct.

Employment misconduct means any intentional, negligent, or indifferent conduct, on the job or off the job, that is a serious violation of the standards of behavior the employer has the right to reasonably expect of the employee.

Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd. 6(a). Paragraph (b) then removes ten categories from the term, among them “simple unsatisfactory conduct,” inefficiency or inadvertence, inability or incapacity, “good faith errors in judgment if judgment was required,” and absence because of illness with proper notice. Paragraph (d) makes a single incident “an important fact that must be considered.” And paragraph (e) closes it: “The definition of employment misconduct provided by this subdivision is exclusive and no other definition applies.” Being fired for cause and committing employment misconduct are not the same finding.

Where this comes up

Sources checked September 8, 2026. Citations independently verified against the primary source September 8, 2026.

Was my firing illegal?